new installer-only LiveISOs - feedback wanted
i just had an idea after some recent activity in calamares regarding accessibility issues - for those who dont know, calamares is the GUI installer program on the LiveISOs
that accessibility issue has been hanging for years, mainly due to missing support for it in QT - there was a patch proposed a few years ago - i tried it back then, and it did allow calamares to send SPI messages - the patch would have meant carrying a custom build of 'qt5-base' just for calamares though; and the patch was never accepted upstream - just today someone presumably representing QT promised to try pushing it through again
around that time, i had been corresponding with a blind person; trying to decide if LXDE was a good DE for accessibility - the "talking" ISO has not been upgraded in years - he told me that MATE and ratpoison are "ok-ish"; but really all DEs are lacking in that respect - as i understand, most blind people use macos; because windoes is not very good at it either - i had the idea then, that the best thing to do was to create an installer ISO with no desktop, that booted straight into X and calamares, if calamares ever gained full accessibility support
now i am thinking that if QT responds well to that patch, it could save a lot of work to prioritize that installer ISO; even if that means implementing all the missing accessibility features in calamares myself; because that could be generally useful to anyone installing any blend of parabola, now that calamares also supports openrc - im also quite sure that calamares would accept the patches; so that would be useful to all distros using calamares
most importantly for parabola, the combination of those features, would allow building many fewer ISOs than we have now - i am thinking of only two actually: one "complete" CLI LiveISO for each i686 and x86_64; having an ncurses option just after login (just as the locale and keymap are selected now) to choose between launching calamares, or dropping down to the classic shell without starting X
there could be two more LiveISOs with LXDE (one each for i686 and x86_64) or other DEs if someone else wants to maintain them; but maybe we dont really need any of those - the openrc and graphical live systems are by far the most difficult to maintain - the systemd/CLI LiveISO will build on most any day, with very little maintenance; and of course they are much simpler to test and debug
just wanted to put that out there for discussion - what do people think about all that (especially ditching the graphical LiveISOs) ?