Parabola Issue Tracker: Issueshttps://labs.parabola.nu/https://labs.parabola.nu/favicon.ico?15367742552017-09-23T15:38:07ZParabola Issue Tracker
Redmine Packages - Packaging Request #1482 (open): [mist] add to PCRhttps://labs.parabola.nu/issues/14822017-09-23T15:38:07Zadfeno
<p>zeropar, a user in the #parabola IRC channel suggested to package mist.</p>
<p>mist is [[<a class="external" href="https://github.com/ethereum/mist">https://github.com/ethereum/mist</a>]]</p>
<p>Note that I <strong>don't</strong> know if it's free/libre (we'll have to investigate that).</p>
<p>Please note that I'm neither in favor nor against packaging these, and I'm not currently doing it (because I have college degree finishing/graduation paper/article to finish). Please talk to zeropar for more information instead.</p> Packages - Packaging Request #1481 (wont-fix): [bisq] add to PCRhttps://labs.parabola.nu/issues/14812017-09-23T15:34:30Zadfeno
<p>zeropar, a user in the #parabola IRC channel suggested to package bisq.</p>
<p>Note that I <strong>don't</strong> know if it's free/libre (we'll have to investigate that).</p>
<p>Please note that I'm neither in favor nor against packaging these, and I'm not currently doing it (because I have college degree finishing/graduation paper/article to finish). Please talk to zeropar for more information instead.</p> Servers - Bug #1405 (open): [web] License incompatibility between current Archweb, konami.js, boo...https://labs.parabola.nu/issues/14052017-07-07T03:01:57Zadfeno
<p>Note: Please take the archweb-generic branch of the parabolaweb repository as base for this bug.</p>
<p>- Our copy of Archweb is licensed under GNU GPL 2 (assumed to be "only" because the "README" file doesn't tell if there is an upgrade possibility).</p>
<p>- konami.js (from commit c0f686e647765860ff4d2fcb7b48122785432b75) is licensed under GNU GPL 3 (assumed to be "only" because the license notice in the file doesn't tell if there is an upgrade possibility).</p>
<p>- "sitestatic/bootstrap-typeahead.js" is licensed under Apache License 2.0.</p>
<p>- "visualize/static/visualize.js" is licensed under GNU GPL 2 (assumed to be "only" because the license notice in the file doesn't tell if there is an upgrade possibility).</p>
<p>- "mirrors/static/mirror_status.js" is licensed under GNU GPL 2 (assumed to be "only" because the license notice in the file doesn't tell if there is an upgrade possibility).</p>
<p>I see the following possibilities:</p>
<p>- Find a version of Archweb which allows upgrading to GNU GPL 3+.</p>
<p>- Remove the scripts licensed under GNU GPL 3 or GNU GPL 3+.</p>
<p>- Remove the scripts licensed under Apache License 2.0.</p>