Project

General

Profile

Freedom issue #2548

[unarchiver] Might be non‐free software

temporaryuser - 20 days ago - . Updated 11 days ago.

Status:
unconfirmed
Priority:
bug
Assignee:
-
% Done:

0%


Description

It looks like The Unarchiver is now non‐free software. At least Wikipedia says so.

History

#1

Updated by bill-auger 20 days ago

[citation needed]

#3

Updated by freemor 11 days ago

Interesting.

As I do not see the source from which the package is compiled. And since that source carries an 
GPL 2.1 License.txt
So either that EULA applies to only that binaries available at the referrenced site. 
(My reading of the situation) or it was a careless use of a boiler plate EULA not realizing the
conflict.
I'm not a licensing wonk so I don't fully understand how all that would fit together. But the 
source is not pulled from the site with the ELUA and thus may be Exempt.
#4

Updated by freemor 11 days ago

For reference the surrent source is pulled from:

  https://bitbucket.org/kosovan/theunarchiver/get/unar1.10.1.tar.gz

#5

Updated by eschwartz 11 days ago

"This software used to be free software, but isn't free anymore" is such an oxymoronic concept. This seems like a non-issue to me.

Any current or future releases of the proprietary freeware aren't being released as non-free source code as far as I can tell, so at worst this would be a rationale to fork the last GPLed code and carry on the torch yourself. Do you know anyone who is interested?

#6

Updated by bill-auger 11 days ago

im not sure that unarchiver is needed - it was added to replace
unar, which was itself a replacement for unrar - i have heard
that bsd-tar can also open rar archives - if the only reason to
fork the project is so that parabola users can open rar archives;
then it may not be necessary

i.e. does this program do anything that other programs can not?

#7

Updated by eschwartz 11 days ago

What precisely did you add? It's in [community] and synced from archlinux.

You should ask whether you have any reason to explicitly blacklist it. Other than the website pointing to some commercial continuation.

#8

Updated by bill-auger 11 days ago

before arch added 'unarchiver', there was an 'unar' package in
[libre] that was exactly the same program with a confusingly
different name - after arch added 'unarchiver', the confusing
'unar' was removed

https://labs.parabola.nu/issues/1769

Also available in: Atom PDF