https://labs.parabola.nu/https://labs.parabola.nu/favicon.ico?15367742552013-06-16T14:07:02ZParabola Issue TrackerPackages - Bug #350: Please Import HandBrake From Arch Community Repohttps://labs.parabola.nu/issues/350?journal_id=46282013-06-16T14:07:02Zfaunofauno@parabola.nu
<ul></ul><p>Last time I tried to build it without faac I discovered two things:</p>
<ul>
<li>The developer(s) weren't very welcoming to the libre faac alternative (see their bug tracker, this may have changed)</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Handbrake doesn't have dependencies because the build system downloads the needed libraries and builds them in place.</li>
</ul>
<p>I just decided it wasn't worth it at the moment :P</p> Packages - Bug #350: Please Import HandBrake From Arch Community Repohttps://labs.parabola.nu/issues/350?journal_id=46292013-06-16T14:11:02Zfaunofauno@parabola.nu
<ul></ul><p>seem like the arch packager made it use (some?) system libs: <a class="external" href="https://projects.archlinux.org/svntogit/community.git/tree/trunk/PKGBUILD?h=packages/handbrake">https://projects.archlinux.org/svntogit/community.git/tree/trunk/PKGBUILD?h=packages/handbrake</a></p> Packages - Bug #350: Please Import HandBrake From Arch Community Repohttps://labs.parabola.nu/issues/350?journal_id=46302013-06-16T16:10:50Zjxself
<ul></ul><p>My understanding is that they dropped FAAC a while ago, based on <a class="external" href="https://trac.handbrake.fr/ticket/127">https://trac.handbrake.fr/ticket/127</a></p>
<p>Since the dependencies are already available in Parabola, I submitted this. :)</p> Packages - Bug #350: Please Import HandBrake From Arch Community Repohttps://labs.parabola.nu/issues/350?journal_id=46312013-06-20T02:23:44ZJorginhojorginho@lavabit.com
<ul></ul><p>I am seeing, and it doesn't use a faac dependence, in arch packages' website doesn't appear.</p> Packages - Bug #350: Please Import HandBrake From Arch Community Repohttps://labs.parabola.nu/issues/350?journal_id=52212014-02-08T22:42:50Zlukeshulukeshu@parabola.nu
<ul><li><strong>Assignee</strong> set to <i>lukeshu</i></li></ul><p>fauno wrote:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Last time I tried to build it without faac I discovered two things:</p>
<ul>
<li>The developer(s) weren't very welcoming to the libre faac alternative (see their bug tracker, this may have changed)</li>
</ul>
</blockquote>
<p>I believe you encountered "The huge blocker here is that FF-AAC is currently an unusable piece of garbage." At first, this seems like not being welcoming. However, the developer who wrote that got involved in FF-AAC, and became the driving force behind FF-AAC development!</p>
<blockquote>
<ul>
<li>Handbrake doesn't have dependencies because the build system downloads the needed libraries and builds them in place.</li>
</ul>
</blockquote>
<p>I've got a work-around for this. It patches some of the dependencies, so a couple of them I had to keep building them in place; in those cases, I have a work-around to put them in source=(), so they are downloaded ahead of time.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>I just decided it wasn't worth it at the moment :P</p>
</blockquote>
<p>User 'coffeeking', who is blind, reports that handbrake is the only one really usable by him.</p>
<p>Anyway, I've been trying to liberate handbrake 0.9.9. The transition to FF-AAC is complete in SVN, so now I'm waiting for the code to check out. I'm unsure whether I will package handbrake-svn, or backport the FAAC/FF-AAC stuff.</p> Packages - Bug #350: Please Import HandBrake From Arch Community Repohttps://labs.parabola.nu/issues/350?journal_id=52912014-03-10T00:35:42Zlukeshulukeshu@parabola.nu
<ul><li><strong>% Done</strong> changed from <i>0</i> to <i>50</i></li></ul><p>Released on x86_64, is currently building for i686.</p> Packages - Bug #350: Please Import HandBrake From Arch Community Repohttps://labs.parabola.nu/issues/350?journal_id=52922014-03-10T00:56:36Zlukeshulukeshu@parabola.nu
<ul><li><strong>Status</strong> changed from <i>open</i> to <i>fixed</i></li><li><strong>% Done</strong> changed from <i>50</i> to <i>100</i></li></ul>