Bug #2634
Updated by theova about 4 years ago
Failed to transition from arch x32.
Attached because of your bad decision of: "Sorry, that post has too many non-dictionary words. Consider putting long command-line outputs and URLs into a file and attaching it with the 'Browse' button below."
EDIT: Include original bug report from attachment
I followed directions to migrate from Arch in a librebooted ThinkPad T60 (/etc/makepackage.conf, CARCH="pentium4")
During the process, several issues arised. Finally I was not able to transition to Parabola.
# Issue 1
pacman: All trackers return "not valid 404".
- "Solution": replace "$arch" at the end of the string of any mirror with "i686" at /etc/pacman.d/mirrorlist
# Issue 2
pacman: Returns not signed error.
Packages (all) do not have a valid architecture.
- "Solution": pacman.conf to not check for signatures
# Issue 3 -- pacman -Suu (after pacman.conf modification)
pacman: Packages (all) do not have a valid architecture.
Attached because of your bad decision of: "Sorry, that post has too many non-dictionary words. Consider putting long command-line outputs and URLs into a file and attaching it with the 'Browse' button below."
EDIT: Include original bug report from attachment
I followed directions to migrate from Arch in a librebooted ThinkPad T60 (/etc/makepackage.conf, CARCH="pentium4")
During the process, several issues arised. Finally I was not able to transition to Parabola.
# Issue 1
pacman: All trackers return "not valid 404".
- "Solution": replace "$arch" at the end of the string of any mirror with "i686" at /etc/pacman.d/mirrorlist
# Issue 2
pacman: Returns not signed error.
Packages (all) do not have a valid architecture.
- "Solution": pacman.conf to not check for signatures
# Issue 3 -- pacman -Suu (after pacman.conf modification)
pacman: Packages (all) do not have a valid architecture.